[Geojson] clarification on Feature id
kgj2 at cornell.edu
Sat Mar 15 16:50:20 PDT 2008
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Christopher Schmidt
<crschmidt at metacarta.com> wrote:
> "id" isn't part of the spec. So, it's definitely not required, though it
> probably makes sense to put it there, and most implementations that I've
> seen that have such a thing will do so. However, I've always seen it as
> reasonably common sense, and not worked it into the spec (though I
> wouldn't have a problem with making it recommended).
I think it makes sense to recommend it, and if so, also to mention it
in the spec as a special element that can exist directly within the
Feature object, rather than being relegated to the properties object.
More information about the GeoJSON