[Geojson] Request for comments (Re: Fixing problems in section 4)
sgillies at frii.com
Thu Mar 13 18:32:40 PDT 2008
Allan Doyle wrote:
> On Mar 13, 2008, at 5:46 PM, Sean Gillies wrote:
> Very nicely written up.
> I was with you until here "Processors may, at their discretion, fall
> back to the default CRS if they encounter an unknown CRS."
> Wouldn't that mean that if you don't understand the CRS, use WGS84?
> That could lead to some interesting results. I would say that
> processors that encounter an unknown CRS should not interpret the
> geographic coordinates.
I thought this would give me explicit permission to do some special
casing, but I've talked myself out of it.
More information about the GeoJSON