[Geojson] Request for comments (Re: Fixing problems in section 4)
Martin.Daly at cadcorp.com
Fri Mar 14 06:50:17 PDT 2008
I think that this is indeed an improvement. Is there any way to
(slightly) modify it to use the "type" and "properties" sort-of model in
other parts of the spec?
All you implementers out there,
Were this to become the CRS part of 1.0, would it adversely affect you?
Or, in other words, any -1's?
More information about the GeoJSON