[GeoJSON] GeoJSON Digest, Vol 64, Issue 3

[Martin Daly]

> > It doesn't make sense to mess with GeoJSON at this point. It's a
> > success. We should digitally sign it and throw away the keys to
> > prevent our future selves from killing it.
> 
> +1 from my side, as GeoJSON shines through simplicity, ... and formats
> derive from form, don't they?
> 
> 
> > Proposed changes that are backwards compatible could be documented
> > as an add-on and would not need be incorporated into the current
> > spec.
> 
> I am also fully aligned with that statement.

Makes sense to me too.

I'm not against adding time per se, but I don't like the precedent being "Yes" instead of "No". That way lies GML 3.

Martin