[Geojson] Fixing problems in section 4

Keith Jenkins kgj2 at cornell.edu
Thu Mar 13 10:37:41 PDT 2008

On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 12:41 PM, Sean Gillies <sgillies at frii.com> wrote:
>  The default case is already done exactly right in the spec. We could
>  make it more clear that almost every open source GIS user could use the
>  default instead of specifying "EPSG:4326".

I'd agree that this should be emphasized.  The main conflict regarding
coordinate order seems to be rooted in the problem that EPSG:4326 is
defined in lat,lon order as opposed to the standard x,y.  So the
simplest thing would be to avoid making reference to it.


More information about the GeoJSON mailing list