[GeoJSON] Aligning implementations
noreply at geocartic.com
Wed Apr 11 01:06:39 PDT 2007
Arnaud Diederen wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> since I've been reading this thread, I've seen nowhere that a client
> would make use of feature type information; hence the necessity to have
> the toplevel 'geometry' property, or the toplevel 'default_geom'
> property to access the corresponding property in the object.
> Since I'm pretty new to this list, maybe I missed something, but.. why
> does nobody take feature type information into consideration?
> I strongly believe a sufficiently advanced feature inspecting/editing
> client will *require* that information.
Do you mean geometry.type, or some other type? In the structures we've
been tossing around, geometry.type is one of 'point', 'linestring',
'polygon', etc. (or their CamelCased equivalents).
More information about the geojson