<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-15"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<font size="+1">Howard,<br>
<br>
On 2011-07-25 5:19 PM, Howard Butler wrote:</font>
<blockquote
cite="mid:573FD2BE-9F89-4535-B472-89B0A66D53AC@gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap=""><font size="+1">
On Jul 25, 2011, at 12:51 PM, John Herring wrote:
</font></pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""><font size="+1">Chris,
The major thing a fast track needs is an extant set of conformance classes; what essentially is a complete abstract test suite for the proposed standard.
</font></pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><font size="+1">
Haha, but serious, doesn't the GeoJSON 1.0 spec already contain that? </font></pre>
</blockquote>
<font size="+1"><br>
Actually, if you mean <a
href="http://geojson.org/geojson-spec.html">http://geojson.org/geojson-spec.html</a>,
then no it does not. The requirements are there for individual
structures, but the test methods, standardization targets and
conformance classes are not specified. <br>
<br>
Regards, <br>
John <br>
<br>
It ain't ignorance causes so much trouble; it's folks knowing so
much that ain't so.<br>
-- Josh Billings (Henry Wheeler Shaw) 1818-1884<br>
</font><br>
The opinions expressed in this email are purely my own and do not
necessarily<br>
represent the opinions of any organization or otherwise sane person
or persons.<br>
<br>
John R. Herring<br>
Architect, Spatial Products<br>
Oracle Corporation<br>
One Oracle Drive<br>
Nashua, New Hampshire 03062<br>
ph: +1 (603) 897 3216<br>
fx: +1 (603) 897 3334<br>
<br>
Annue c˝ptis - Novus Ordo Seclorum<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>