[GeoJSON] GeoJSON and JSON-LD

[Thijs Brentjens]

Sean,

Sounds very good to me. I'm quite new to creating vocabularies (and 
using good existing ones), but I'll be available for help / thoughts. 
And making examples.

Regards,.
Thijs

On 10/03/14 16:59, Sean Gillies wrote:
> Thijs,
>
> How does the following sound for a plan?
>
> 1. Publish a simple vocabulary, nothing more than URIs identifying the 
> GeoJSON terms and a paragraph describing each all in one document. 
> Using hash URIs as shown in http://geojson.org/vocab.
> 2. Publish a default context for GeoJSON using that vocabulary.
> 3. Begin publishing GeoJSON with JSON-LD contexts and start showing 
> people how to take advantage of it.
>
> I bet we could get this done by July 1.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 6:05 AM, Thijs Brentjens 
> <thijs at brentjensgeoict.nl <mailto:thijs at brentjensgeoict.nl>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Sean and others on the list,
>
>     Good idea indeed.
>     I see increasing interest in GeoJSON + JSON-LD as well. I'm
>     working on a (very basic) demo tool to easily create LD-contexts
>     for existing GeoJSON encoded data. One of the things I was looking
>     for was a default context for GeoJSON data, to extend it with
>     terms of the properties for that specific data.
>
>     Best regards,
>     Thijs
>
>
>      On 07/03/14 07:32, Stefan Drees wrote:
>
>         Hi Sean,
>
>         On 2014-03-07 05:32 +01:00, Sean Gillies wrote:
>
>             ...
>             I'm seeing increasing interest in JSON-LD out there and so
>             I've set up
>             https://github.com/geojson/geojson-ld as a place to work
>             out identifiers
>             for GeoJSON vocabulary terms, write down concordances with
>             other linked
>             data vocabularies, document best practices, and come up
>             with a standard
>             GeoJSON context document that applications could share.
>
>
>         I like it Sean. Good idea - could we alos use this to take any
>         pressure out of the discussions circling around SRS et al.?
>
>         Just a nit:
>         The elipsis is clear enough, but I would like in samples to be
>         otherwise valid - what about changing the last line in the
>         @context object's text rep from '"Thing":
>         "http://schema.org/Thing",'
>         into '"Thing": "http://schema.org/Thing"' (ie. dropping the
>         comma) :-?
>
>
>         All the best,
>         Stefan
>         _______________________________________________
>         GeoJSON mailing list
>         GeoJSON at lists.geojson.org <mailto:GeoJSON at lists.geojson.org>
>         http://lists.geojson.org/listinfo.cgi/geojson-geojson.org
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     GeoJSON mailing list
>     GeoJSON at lists.geojson.org <mailto:GeoJSON at lists.geojson.org>
>     http://lists.geojson.org/listinfo.cgi/geojson-geojson.org
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Sean Gillies
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GeoJSON mailing list
> GeoJSON at lists.geojson.org
> http://lists.geojson.org/listinfo.cgi/geojson-geojson.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.geojson.org/pipermail/geojson-geojson.org/attachments/20140311/7b732b77/attachment.htm>