[GeoJSON] Future plans for GeoJSON

[Martin Daly]

> I'm ok with taking it out, too. I'd rather see a separate CRSJSON that can fit within the structure of GeoJSON. Maybe this could
> point the way towards a general JSON interleaving trend. Better to keep individual specs concise.

Absolutely. I tried to steer the OGC CRS-WKT SWG onto JSON, but, in the land of the blind, BNF is still king.

I'd be up for helping with an RFC.

Martin