[Geojson] Inclusion in OData
Arlo Belshee
Arlo.Belshee at microsoft.com
Thu Nov 3 18:19:25 PDT 2011
As I mentioned a while back, we're using GeoJson to format the geospatial primitives in OData V3. A new wrinkle has arisen; I'm looking for input.
We are strongly considering taking OData to a standards body. If OData goes through standardization, then it will only be able to take normative references on other standardized formats. So we can't include GeoJson by reference, as it currently is defined.
I'm trying to figure out how to reference GeoJson. In the end, one of the most important considerations is the preference of this community.
I see the following options.
* GeoJson goes through official standardization, and then OData references it.
* OData copies in the parts of GeoJson that we use (the representations for the spatial types, but not the features or rest of the doc), then modifies as necessary.
o We state this to be GeoJson.
o We do not state this to be GeoJson, and have explicit permission from you all to do so.
Does anyone see any more? Does anyone have any preferences between options?
I've been happy with our choice of GeoJson so far. I appreciate any guidance you can give on how best to link to it from an official standard. Thanks.
Arlo Belshee
Sr. Program Manager, OData, Microsoft
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.geojson.org/pipermail/geojson-geojson.org/attachments/20111104/197c83ab/attachment.htm>
More information about the GeoJSON
mailing list