[Geojson] [georss] [Geowanking] openARML augmented Reality Markuplanguage ~ extended KML?

[Carl Reed]

Should be an interesting discussion!

I would also add that many government organizations and private sector 
companies provide geospatial content as GML application schemas. I would 
encourage the group to consider developments in Europe for sharing (and 
visualizing) 3d urban models using an application schema of GML called 
CityGML. The German community especially is looking at CityGML and its role 
in the AR domain. From a standards perspective, the sharing and 
visualization of geo content for AR applications is multi faceted. Both 
CityGML and KML may have roles in AR. Further, if there are location 
elements to be added to an AR "language" or "grammar", I would really 
encourage that community to be consistent with ISO 19107, which the 
foundation abstract model for spatial schemas/geometry used by GML, GeoRSS, 
KML (yes, geometry in KML is consistent with 19107), OGC Simple Features, 
and so forth.

Just a thought :-)

Also, as a standards geek I shudder when I hear "custom extensions".

Regards

Carl
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Anselm Hook" <anselm at gmail.com>
To: "Mike Liebhold" <mnl at well.com>
Cc: "geojson" <geojson at lists.geojson.org>; <geowanking at geowanking.org>; 
<georss at lists.eogeo.org>
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 11:16 AM
Subject: Re: [georss] [Geowanking] openARML augmented Reality Markuplanguage 
~ extended KML?


>> Many companies and organizations have their geo data already available in
>> KML. Therefore it makes perfect sense to base the AR data on KML and 
>> enrich
>> it with custom extensions.
>
> ahhahahahaahaha.... ha... hahaha....... ha.  sob.
>
> me
> _______________________________________________
> georss mailing list
> georss at lists.eogeo.org
> http://lists.eogeo.org/mailman/listinfo/georss