[Geojson] Draft Version 6 Feature Complete?

[Tim Schaub]

Sean Gillies wrote:
> Christopher Schmidt wrote:
>> On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 10:19:55PM -0600, Sean Gillies wrote:
>>> Christopher Schmidt wrote:
>>>> Is there any reason not to call Version 6 "1.0" and start doing work
>>>> around documenting it, seting up examples, prettifying it, etc.? I think
>>>> the specification language is as solid as it's ever going to be.
>>>>
>>>>  I'm +1 on calling Draftv6 final.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>> I'd prefer that a not wiki text version be the normative one.
>> The only section that I consider normative is the 'Specification'
>> section: everything else is simply informative. My plan was always that
>> that section would be frozen as plain text or flat HTML markup, and that
>> we could then develop around that.
>>
>> Does that make sense? Do we want to use rst for that?
>>
>> Regards,
> 
> Makes sense to me. I think the smaller and tighter the spec, the better.
> I'm in favor of restructured text.

+1 as well.

Tim

> 
> Sean
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Geojson mailing list
> Geojson at lists.geojson.org
> http://lists.geojson.org/listinfo.cgi/geojson-geojson.org
> 
> !DSPAM:4033,4821c798201001012714783!
>