[Geojson] Draft Version 6 Feature Complete?
David William Bitner
bitner at gyttja.org
Fri May 2 06:24:16 PDT 2008
+1 let's rock & roll
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 7:28 AM, Andrew Turner @ mapufacture <
andrew at mapufacture.com> wrote:
> +1 to ship
>
>
> On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 7:21 AM, Christopher Schmidt
> <crschmidt at metacarta.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 10:19:55PM -0600, Sean Gillies wrote:
> > > Christopher Schmidt wrote:
> > > > Is there any reason not to call Version 6 "1.0" and start doing
> work
> > > > around documenting it, seting up examples, prettifying it, etc.? I
> think
> > > > the specification language is as solid as it's ever going to be.
> > > >
> > > > I'm +1 on calling Draftv6 final.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > >
> > > I'd prefer that a not wiki text version be the normative one.
> >
> > The only section that I consider normative is the 'Specification'
> > section: everything else is simply informative. My plan was always that
> > that section would be frozen as plain text or flat HTML markup, and
> that
> > we could then develop around that.
> >
> > Does that make sense? Do we want to use rst for that?
> >
> > Regards,
> > --
> > Christopher Schmidt
> > MetaCarta
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Geojson mailing list
> > Geojson at lists.geojson.org
> > http://lists.geojson.org/listinfo.cgi/geojson-geojson.org
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Andrew Turner
> mobile: 248.982.3609
> andrew at mapufacture.com 42.2774N x 83.7611W
> http://highearthorbit.com Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
>
> http://mapufacture.com Helping build the Geospatial Web
> Introduction to Neogeography - http://oreilly.com/catalog/neogeography
> _______________________________________________
> Geojson mailing list
> Geojson at lists.geojson.org
> http://lists.geojson.org/listinfo.cgi/geojson-geojson.org
>
--
************************************
David William Bitner
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.geojson.org/pipermail/geojson-geojson.org/attachments/20080502/77e82e68/attachment-0004.htm>
More information about the GeoJSON
mailing list