[Geojson] Draft Version 6 Feature Complete?

[Andrew Turner @ mapufacture]

+1 to ship


On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 7:21 AM, Christopher Schmidt
<crschmidt at metacarta.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 10:19:55PM -0600, Sean Gillies wrote:
>  > Christopher Schmidt wrote:
>  > > Is there any reason not to call Version 6 "1.0" and start doing work
>  > > around documenting it, seting up examples, prettifying it, etc.? I think
>  > > the specification language is as solid as it's ever going to be.
>  > >
>  > >  I'm +1 on calling Draftv6 final.
>  > >
>  > > Regards,
>  >
>  > I'd prefer that a not wiki text version be the normative one.
>
>  The only section that I consider normative is the 'Specification'
>  section: everything else is simply informative. My plan was always that
>  that section would be frozen as plain text or flat HTML markup, and that
>  we could then develop around that.
>
>  Does that make sense? Do we want to use rst for that?
>
>  Regards,
>  --
>  Christopher Schmidt
>  MetaCarta
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>  Geojson mailing list
>  Geojson at lists.geojson.org
>  http://lists.geojson.org/listinfo.cgi/geojson-geojson.org
>



-- 
Andrew Turner
mobile: 248.982.3609
andrew at mapufacture.com 42.2774N x 83.7611W
http://highearthorbit.com Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

http://mapufacture.com Helping build the Geospatial Web
Introduction to Neogeography - http://oreilly.com/catalog/neogeography