[Geojson] Draft Version 6 Feature Complete?

Sean Gillies sgillies at frii.com
Wed May 7 08:15:28 PDT 2008

Christopher Schmidt wrote:
> On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 10:19:55PM -0600, Sean Gillies wrote:
>> Christopher Schmidt wrote:
>>> Is there any reason not to call Version 6 "1.0" and start doing work
>>> around documenting it, seting up examples, prettifying it, etc.? I think
>>> the specification language is as solid as it's ever going to be.
>>>  I'm +1 on calling Draftv6 final.
>>> Regards,
>> I'd prefer that a not wiki text version be the normative one.
> The only section that I consider normative is the 'Specification'
> section: everything else is simply informative. My plan was always that
> that section would be frozen as plain text or flat HTML markup, and that
> we could then develop around that.
> Does that make sense? Do we want to use rst for that?
> Regards,

Makes sense to me. I think the smaller and tighter the spec, the better.
I'm in favor of restructured text.


More information about the GeoJSON mailing list