[Geojson] Draft Version 6 Feature Complete?
Andrew Turner @ mapufacture
andrew at mapufacture.com
Fri May 2 05:28:12 PDT 2008
+1 to ship
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 7:21 AM, Christopher Schmidt
<crschmidt at metacarta.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 10:19:55PM -0600, Sean Gillies wrote:
> > Christopher Schmidt wrote:
> > > Is there any reason not to call Version 6 "1.0" and start doing work
> > > around documenting it, seting up examples, prettifying it, etc.? I think
> > > the specification language is as solid as it's ever going to be.
> > >
> > > I'm +1 on calling Draftv6 final.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > I'd prefer that a not wiki text version be the normative one.
> The only section that I consider normative is the 'Specification'
> section: everything else is simply informative. My plan was always that
> that section would be frozen as plain text or flat HTML markup, and that
> we could then develop around that.
> Does that make sense? Do we want to use rst for that?
> Christopher Schmidt
> Geojson mailing list
> Geojson at lists.geojson.org
andrew at mapufacture.com 42.2774N x 83.7611W
http://highearthorbit.com Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
http://mapufacture.com Helping build the Geospatial Web
Introduction to Neogeography - http://oreilly.com/catalog/neogeography
More information about the Geojson