[Geojson] Draft Version 6 Feature Complete?
mateusz at loskot.net
Thu May 1 22:05:26 PDT 2008
Christopher Schmidt wrote:
> Is there any reason not to call Version 6 "1.0" and start doing work
> around documenting it, seting up examples, prettifying it, etc.? I think
> the specification language is as solid as it's ever going to be.
> I'm +1 on calling Draftv6 final.
If my vote counts, +1 :-)
More information about the GeoJSON