[Geojson] Draft Version 6 Feature Complete?
sgillies at frii.com
Thu May 1 21:19:55 PDT 2008
Christopher Schmidt wrote:
> Is there any reason not to call Version 6 "1.0" and start doing work
> around documenting it, seting up examples, prettifying it, etc.? I think
> the specification language is as solid as it's ever going to be.
> I'm +1 on calling Draftv6 final.
I'd prefer that a not wiki text version be the normative one.
More information about the GeoJSON