[GeoJSON] To GML, or not to GML, that is the question

[Allan Doyle]

-1 on 1.
+1 on 2.

On Mar 28, 2007, at 06:40, Martin Daly wrote:

> We've had some skirting round this issue, but I think that before  
> we get
> too much further (with GeoJSON Features at least) we need to have a
> consensus on what we are trying to achieve.
>
> The options that I see are:
>
> 1. Encode GML in JSON, with a reasonably faithful translation between
> XML and JSON.
>
> or
>
> 2. Encode OGC Simple Features in JSON, learning from, but not
> translating, GML.
>
> I'm in favour of 2.
>
> Any other opinions, or options?
>
> M
> _______________________________________________
> geojson mailing list
> geojson at lists.geojson.org
> http://lists.geojson.org/listinfo.cgi/geojson-geojson.org

-- 
Allan Doyle
+1.781.433.2695
adoyle at eogeo.org