[GeoJSON] AsJSON(geometry)

[Martin Daly]

> I think that's needlessly fluffy. Once you know the typology, 
> you can deal with anonymous arrays-of-arrays perfectly well. 

I agree and prefer:

    {"multipoint": "[[x00 y00], [x11 y11], ..., [xNN yNN]]"}

> The only exception is GeometryCollection... do you want to 
> handle anonymous collections?

The OGC Simple Features set would seem to be a reasonable target, so I
would say yes to GeometryCollection.

> Which brings out the possibility of beyond-SFSQL types.  
> CurveString, CompoundCurve, CurvePolygon, from ISO SQL/MM. 
> Interest there?

I think that we should master walking before we try to run.

M