[GeoJSON] Modifying the spec development process

Allan Doyle adoyle at eogeo.org
Tue Jun 12 09:11:44 PDT 2007


Put a bunch of geeks in a room, and what do they argue about?

How did we ever get to the moon? What rev was that lander anyway?

On Jun 12, 2007, at 12:07, Martin Daly wrote:

>> I'm uncomfortable with using RFCs. It implies a formality
>> that isn't really there, and TLAs suck.
>>
>> I propose that instead, we simply call it the GeoJSON draft
>> (or specification draft), and stick a version number on it.
>> The document, as it stands (rev 124), would be version 2.
>
> Version 0.2, with the "final" release 1.0?
>
> M
> _______________________________________________
> geojson mailing list
> geojson at lists.geojson.org
> http://lists.geojson.org/listinfo.cgi/geojson-geojson.org

-- 
Allan Doyle
+1.781.433.2695
adoyle at eogeo.org






More information about the GeoJSON mailing list