[GeoJSON] Integrating GeoJSON with other kinds of data via JDIL
Panagiotis (Peter) A. Vretanos
pvretano at cubewerx.com
Sun Jun 3 12:05:46 PDT 2007
Chris,
I was just wondering based on Sean's comments. I interpreted his
comments to mean that 'type' is not strictly required. Perhaps I did
not quite understand his gist - I'm fairly new to JSON. My apologies if
I rubbed you the wrong way.
Your explanation sound reasonable to me and I have no problem leaving it
at that.
Ciao.
Christopher Schmidt wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 01:36:28PM -0400, Panagiotis (Peter) A. Vretanos wrote:
>> What is the point of repeating "type":"Feature" with every feature
>> instance? Does JSON require this?
>
> This makes the FeatureCollection contain objects which are each GeoJSON
> objects in and of themselves. This makes the internal chunks
> copy-pastable, and the end result is a tiny addition to the JSON
> datastructure with large benefits (in my opinion). Essentially, a
> GeoJSON object is built up recursively of GeoJSON objects, which I
> consider to be a large benefit. I'll fight hard for this for as long as
> my opinion means something.
>
> Regards,
--
Panagiotis (Peter) A. Vretanos CubeWerx Inc.
Big Kahuna (Senior Database Developer) http://www.cubewerx.com
Tel. 416-701-1985 Fax. 416-701-9870 pvretano at cubewerx.com
"Hail! Hail! Rock and Roll!" -- Charles Edward Anderson Berry
More information about the GeoJSON
mailing list