[GeoJSON] Modifying the spec development process

Martin Daly Martin.Daly at cadcorp.com
Tue Jun 12 09:07:22 PDT 2007


> I'm uncomfortable with using RFCs. It implies a formality 
> that isn't really there, and TLAs suck.
> 
> I propose that instead, we simply call it the GeoJSON draft 
> (or specification draft), and stick a version number on it. 
> The document, as it stands (rev 124), would be version 2.

Version 0.2, with the "final" release 1.0?

M


More information about the geojson mailing list