[GeoJSON] Aligning implementations
noreply at geocartic.com
Mon Apr 9 15:44:26 PDT 2007
Chris Holmes wrote:
> I definitely have a set of users who want to be able to serve up data
> even if it doesn't have a geometry.
Ok, I still like
or no sign of geometry at all.
> [multiple geometries]
> what do I do?
Not that hard to say that the data structure should be (for each feature):
Though I wonder if people would complain about having to do geometry
(or equivalent) most of the time.
You got me curious about all these people who want to serve up
geographic features with no geometry. I wonder if you just mean null or
broken geometry - or if there really is a world where people deal in
geography without geometry.
More information about the geojson