[Geojson] coordinate order

[Sean Gillies]

A Feature has a "geometry" member (3.1).

Sean

Andrew Turner wrote:
> Mapufacture also puts out GeoJSON
> 
> http://mapufacture.com/feeds/1010424.json
> 
> And I'm adding GeoJSON in as well.
> 
> 
> Just to make sure - there isn't any way to identify what element of
> the response is the actual geometry, is there? You just have to test
> if there is "type" and "coordinates"?
> 
> 
> On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Panagiotis (Peter) A. Vretanos
> <pvretano at cubewerx.com> wrote:
>> Christopher Schmidt wrote:
>>  > On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 11:34:25AM -0700, Tim Schaub wrote:
>>  >> Makes things a bit more complex for clients who know about CRS and
>>  >> simpler for the rest.
>>  >
>>  > Agreed. I like the change. I never liked the absolute restriction on
>>  > EPSG identifiers, and this puts the onus on people who want to use them
>>  > to do so such that the meta-information in the CRS object describes what
>>  > clients need to know, and allows for clients who need more to get what
>>  > they want.
>>  >
>>  > Importantly, No existing data will be made invalid by the changes we've
>>  > made.
>>  >
>>  >> I think this thing is ready to let out into the wild.
>>  >
>>  > Agreed. Currently we have GeoJSON in use by:
>>  >
>>  > Libaries:
>>  >  * OpenLayers
>>  >  * OGR (http://gdal.org/ogr/drv_geojson.html)
>>  >  * MapFish Java implementation?
>>  >    https://trac.mapfish.org/trac/mapfish/ticket/73
>>  >  * GeoJSON Python Library, http://pypi.python.org/pypi/GeoJSON/1.0a3
>>  >  * Shapely (GeoJSON Geometries)
>>  >
>>  > Servers:
>>  >  * FeatureServer
>>  >  * GeoServer
>>  >  * WPServer
>>  >  * Pleiades?
>>  >  * Knowhere? I Think.
>>  >
>>  > Desktop Apps:
>>  >  * FME
>>  >  * Cadcorp SIS (I hear? can't find a link)
>>  >  * Arc2Earth, according to http://tinyurl.com/2oo5o8
>>  >
>>  > Web Services:
>>  >  * geo:truc, http://www.geotruc.net/
>>  >  * FireEagle, I hear?
>>  >
>>  > Are there more that I'm forgetting?  I googled for a while, but couldn't
>>  > find anything else obvious.
>>  >
>>  > Is there any reason not to 'go to 1.0' with the current specification?
>>  >
>>  > Regards,
>>
>>  Chris,
>>
>>  Don't forget CubeSERV from CubeWerx.  We server GeoJSON too.
>>
>>  http://www.pvretano.com/cwwfs/cubeserv.cgi?datastore=TEST&service=WFS&version=1.1.0&request=GetFeature&typeName=AEROFACP_1M&outputFormat=JSON&maxFeatures=10
>>
>>  We did an interop experiment with Martin Daly from Cadcorp a while back
>>  and he confirmed that he was able to read from our server.
>>
>>  I have not updated our server recently so it may be a version or two out
>>  of date but I will get to that soon.
>>
>>  Ciao.
>>
>>  --
>>  Panagiotis (Peter) A. Vretanos          CubeWerx Inc.
>>  Big Kahuna (Senior Database Developer)  http://www.cubewerx.com
>>  Tel. 416-701-1985 Fax. 416-701-9870     pvretano at cubewerx.com
>>
>>  "If you are in a spaceship that is traveling at the speed of light,
>>   and you turn on the headlights, does anything happen?" --Stephen Wright
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>  Geojson mailing list
>>  Geojson at lists.geojson.org
>>  http://lists.geojson.org/listinfo.cgi/geojson-geojson.org
>>
> 
> 
>