[Geojson] Outstanding Issues?

[Sean Gillies]

It's viral; part of me likes that.

Sean

Allan Doyle wrote:
> In re-reading the click-through license, it says:
> 
> "Permission is hereby granted, free of charge and subject to the  
> terms set forth below, to any person obtaining a copy of this  
> Intellectual Property and any associated documentation, to deal in  
> the Intellectual Property without restriction (except as set forth  
> below), including without limitation the rights to implement, use,  
> copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, and/or sublicense copies of  
> the Intellectual Property, and to permit persons to whom the  
> Intellectual Property is furnished to do so, provided that all  
> copyright notices on the intellectual property are retained intact and
> 
>    that each person to whom the Intellectual Property
>    is furnished agrees to the terms of this Agreement."
> 
> So, I'm not touching this. I vote we leave the link to the OGC spec  
> out of the GeoJSON document. If OGC wants their specs to be read and  
> used, maybe they will someday come to their senses and deal with this  
> issue.
> 
> 	Allan
> 
> 
> On Oct 19, 2007, at 11:21 , Jason Birch wrote:
> 
>> Works for me :)
>>
>> Jason
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Allan Doyle
>> Subject: Re: [Geojson] Outstanding Issues?
>>
>> I'm game to follow those directions and post a version of that spec on
>> the GeoJSON website. That way we lose the click-through and are  
>> good to
>> go. We can link to our local copy.