[Geojson] Outstanding Issues?

[Martin Daly]

> I'm out of touch, but I think that:
> 
>  http://wiki.geojson.org/GeoJSON_draft_version_5
> 
> represents "the will of the people" as best as possible. Are there any
> outstanding things that need to be fixed before we call this 'final'
and
> ship it?

Add (in Specification)?

-----------------------------------
5. GeoJSON is intended for use as a software-to-software encoding for
features and their geometry.  GeoJSON contains no definition of the
meaning of the geometry constructs, nor any explicit or implicit rules
on the 'validity' of the encoded geometry (other than that it must be
encoded as described).  However, for maximum interoperability, it is
recommended that the encoded geometry follow the definitions and rules
of the OGC Implementation Specification for Geographic information -
Simple features access - Part 1: Common architecture
(http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=18241).

-----------------------------------

M